آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,492 |
| تعداد مقالات | 18,196 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 58,885,921 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 20,371,233 |
Analytical Study of the Role of the Industry of Religion of Ibn Khaldun, Discipline and Technology of the Self of Foucault in Power Domination | ||
| مجله پژوهش های فلسفی | ||
| دوره 17، شماره 45، 1402، صفحه 175-190 اصل مقاله (267.06 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی- پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/jpiut.2023.56104.3511 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| غلامرضا منصوری* | ||
| دانشجوی دکتری علوم سیاسی، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| In some point of view, neither Michel Foucault nor Ibn Khaldun are considered philosophers in the conventional classifications, but both are very important in intellectual and, of course, in philosophical contexts, especially for those who are interested in the deep study of human life from the perspective of political thought.The main concern of two thinkers, one in the 14th century, the other in the 20th century, is the issue of power, although neither of them provided a precise definition of it. In this article, an attempt has been made to show the place of power and domination in the political thought of both thinkers by examining the thoughts of two thinkers. And in search of an answer to this question, how did Asabiyyah and industry of religion in Ibn Khaldun's thought and social control through self-technology and discipline in Foucault's thought lead to the expansion of the domination of power? This article is written by analytically comparing the opinions of two thinkers based on Ibn Khaldun's most important book called Muqaddimah and Foucault's late works | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Ibn Khaldun؛ Michel Foucault؛ power؛ Asabiyyah؛ industry of religion؛ domination | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Agamben, G. (2022). The Violence and law. Translated by M. Farhadpour, Ney. (in persian) Ayatollahy, H. (2023). Islamic Approach to Philosophy of Religion Compared with the Western One, in The Journal of Philosophical Theological Research (JPTR), University of Qom, 25 (Special Issue on Comparative Philosophy of Religion), 63-82, https://doi.org/10.22091/jptr.2023.9679.2924 Harliana H. & Hani S. (2017). The principal thinking of Ibn Khaldun. Social Sciences University of Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Indonesia, 2(10), 142-158. Bolton, A. (2017). Ibn Khaldun on luxury and the destruction of civilizations. Fountainmagazine 25(117), 25-40. Cheddadi, A. (2005). Reconnaissance d’Ibn Khaldün. Article publié initialement dans la revue Esprit, 23-42. Damian S. (2004). Religion and the State in Ibn Khaldiin's Muqaddimah. McGill University. Dreyfus, H. (2008). Michel Foucault, beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. translated by Z. Azadani, Ney. (in persian) Firahi, D. (2014). Fiqh wa Siyasat. Ney. (in persian) Foucault, M. (1994). The Order of Things. Vintage Book. Foucault, M. (1998). Care and Punishment, translated by M. Sarkhosh & A. Jahandideh, Ney. (in persian) Foucault, M. (2016). The Origin of Hermeneutics of Self. translated by M. Sarkhosh & A. Jahandideh, Ney. (in persian) Foucault, M. (2021). The Origin of Hermeunitic of the Self. translated by M. Sarkhosh & A. Jahandideh, Ney. (in persin) Ghasemi. A. (2022). The Tension between Faith and Reason in Islamic Tradition: A Case Study of Imam Muhammad Ghazali, in The Journal of Philosophical Theological Research (JPTR), University of Qom, 24(91), 67-88, https://doi.org/10.22091/jptr.2022.7659.2646 http://www.thesis11.com/Article.aspx?Id=6478 (2020). https://oxfordre.com/communication/display/10.1093/. yun.ir/f1olzc. (2023) https://philosophynow.org/issues/50/Ibn_Khaldun_and_the_Philosophy_of_History. yun.ir/nva9j. (2023) Ibn Khaldun, M. (1968). Muqaddimah. translated by M. Gonabadi, Bongahe Tarjomeh va Nashre Ketab (in persian). Ibn Taqtaqi (Fakhri), M. (2011). In the manners of governance and Islamic states. Tarikh-e moaser. (in persian) Jamshidiha, G. & Baqaie Sarabi, A. (2010). Ibn Khaldun: historian or positivist? Iranian Sociology Journal, 12(1-2), 94-126. (in persian) Lascoste, Y. (2007). Ideology of Ibn Khaldun. University of Tehran. (in persian) Lorenzini, D. (2015). What is Regime of Truth, le foucauldian, University of Saint-Louis, Brussels, 2. 10.16995/lefou.2 Masoudi, J. (2010). The critique on islamic-arabic reason in Abed aljaberi and mohamad Arkuon's view. Philosophical-Theological Research. 11(2), 33-60. (in persian) Mozaffari, F. (2021). Foucauldian Panopticism in Donald Barthelme’s “Subpoena”. Philosophical Investigation of Tabriz University, 15(36), 357-368. https://dx.doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2021.47286.2921 Önder, M. (2018). Ibn Khaldun’s cyclycal theory on the rise and fall of sovereign power: the case of Ottoman Empire. Adam Akademi, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, 2(5), 120-130. 10.31679/adamakademi.453944 Sajad, A. (2022). Ibn Khaldun’s view on man, society and state in the light of al Muqaddimah. Malysian Journal for Islamic Study, 3(22), 1-9. journal.unisza.edu.my. Springborg, P. (1986). Politics, Primordialism, and Orientalism: Marx, Aristotle, and the Myth of the Gemeinschaft. The American Political Science Review, 80(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/1957090 Tabari, M. (1976). Tarikh al Omam va Almoluk (Tarikh e Tabari). Ravae e Altorath. Vasfi, M. (2016). Nomotazelian. Nashr-e Negah-e Moaser. (in persian) Walajahi, h. (2019). Constructing Identities. Genet Med. 21(8), 1744–1750. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642857/ www.britannica.com/biography/Ibn-Khaldun. yun.ir/pcnpg1. (2023) | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 555 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 482 |
||