The Relationship between Two Secular and Theological Interpretations of the Concept of Highest Good in Kant: with respect to the criticism of Andrews Reath’s paper “Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant”

ماحوزی, رضا; سعیدی, زهره

فهرست نشریات دارای اعتبار وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری

تعداد نشریات	45
تعداد شماره‌ها	1,435
تعداد مقالات	17,673
تعداد مشاهده مقاله	57,698,702
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله	19,373,313

	The Relationship between Two Secular and Theological Interpretations of the Concept of Highest Good in Kant: with respect to the criticism of Andrews Reath’s paper “Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant”
مجله پژوهش های فلسفی
مقاله 10، دوره 11، شماره 21، 1396، صفحه 93-107 اصل مقاله (362.32 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی- پژوهشی
نویسندگان
رضا ماحوزی^* ¹؛ زهره سعیدی²
¹دانشیار پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی؛
²استادیار، پژوهشکده فرهنگ، هنر و ارتباطات
چکیده
Discussing two common critiques on theological interpretations of the concept of the highest good in Kant’s moral philosophy in his paper, Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant, Reath has invited readers to have a secular interpretation of this concept and pointed out its advantages. In the present paper, we will attempt to provide the main principles of Reath’s claims and demonstrate why Kant has stated both of these interpretations in all of his critical works—a subject that has confused Reath. For this purpose, we will indicate that in both of the above interpretations, Kant has offered the concept of the highest good in a historical context, in which the intellectual idea of the highest good as a desired ultimate totality makes the intellect to grow in history and cultivate the talents of human kind through numerous conflicts embedded in nature.
کلیدواژه‌ها
history؛ nature؛ highest good؛ happiness؛ virtue؛ conflict

مراجع
Allison, H. (2001) Kant’s Theory of taste, Cambridge University Press. Beck, L. (1960) A Commentary on Kant's Critique of Practical Reason, University of Chicago press. Kant, I. (1960) Education (ED), A. Churton, trans, Ann Arbor, MI. University of Michigan Press. Kant, I. (1983) Idea for a Universal History from a Cosmopolitan Point of View (IDEA), E. Humphrey, trans. Indianapolis, IN, Hackett Publishing Company. - Kant, I. (1979) The Conflict of the Faculties (CF), translation and introduction by J. Gregor, New York. Kant, I. (2002) Critique of Practical Reason (CPrR), Werner S. Pluhar.Hackett Publishing Company, United States of America. Kant, I. (2000) Critique of the Power of Judgment (CJ), P. Guyer ed.; E. Matthews and P. Guyer, trans.Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Kant, I. (2009) Religion within the bounds of bare reason (REL), Werner S. Pluhar.Hackett Publishing Company, United States of America. Kant, I. (2006) Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View (AN), R. Louden, ed. and trans. M.Kuehn, intro. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Kant, I. (1997) Lectures on ethics (LE), Louis Infield; foreword to the Torchbook ed. by Lewis White Beck, national library of Australia. Kant, I. (2006) Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace and History (TP), David Bromwich. Yale University, Yale University Press. Reath, Andrews (1988), Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant, Journal of the History of Philosophy, Volume 26, Number 4, pp. 593-619.
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 455 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 342

سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب

پیوندهای مفید

آمار

The Relationship between Two Secular and Theological Interpretations of the Concept of Highest Good in Kant: with respect to the criticism of Andrews Reath’s paper “Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant”