The Role of Synchronous and Asynchronous Multimodal Scaffolding in Learners’ Writing Complexity Improvement

Abe, M. (2021). L2 interactional competence in asynchronous multiparty text-    based communication: study of online collaborative writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(4), 409-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1614070

Abrams, Z. I. (2003). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00184

An, Y., & Frich, T. (2006). Students’ perceptions of synchronous computer-mediated communication in face-to-face courses. Computer-mediated communication, 11(20), 211-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00023.x

AbuSeileek, A. (2012). The effect of computer assisted cooperative learning method and group size on EFL learners’ achievement in communication skills. Computers and Education, 58(1). 231-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.011

Ackerman, J. M. (1993). The promise of writing to learn. Written Communication, 10(3). 334–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010003002

Ajabshir, Z. (2019). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) on EFL learners' pragmatic competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.015

Bailey, D., Almusharraf, N., & Hatcher, R. (2021). Finding Satisfaction: Intrinsic Motivation for Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication in the Online Language Learning Context. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 2563-2583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10369-z

Bhowmik, S. K., Hilman, B., & Roy, S. (2019). Peer collaborative writing in the EAP classroom: Insights from a Canadian postsecondary context., TESOL Journal 10(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.393

Bikowski, D., & Vithanage, R. (2016). Effects of web-based collaborative writing on individual L2 writing development. Language Learning & Technology, 20, 79–99. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2016/bikowskivithanage.pdf

Cao, G. M., & Tian, Q. F. (2020). Social media use and its effect on university student’s learning and academic performance in the UAE. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1801538

Cha, Y. Kim, N., & Kim, H-S. (2022). Effects of EFL Learners’ Perspectives on Online English Classes: Gender, Major, and Proficiency. Journal of English Teaching through Movies and Media, 23(1), 42-57. https://doi.org/10.16875/stem.2022.23.1.42

Chanlin, L. J. (2001). The effects of gender and presentation format in computer-based learning. Educational Media International, 38(1), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980010021244

Cho, H. (2017). Synchronous web-based collaborative writing: factors mediating interaction among second-language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.013

Choi, J. (2002). The role of online collaboration in promoting ESL writing. English Language Teaching, 1(1), 34-49. https://doi.org/10.5539/ELT.V1N1P34

Crosthwaite, P., Hutchison, S., Wijayatilake, C., & Souza. N. (2017). Mindset for IELTS. Cambridge University Press.

Darhower, M. (2002). Interactional features of synchronous computer-mediated communication in the intermediate L2 class: A sociocultural case study. CALICO Journal, 19(2), 249-277. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24149361

De Freitas, S., & Neumann, T. (2009). Pedagogic strategies supporting the use of synchronous audiographic conferencing: A review of the literature. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 980–998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00887.x

Dobao, A. F. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 40–58.

Ene, E., & Upton, T. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous teacher electronic feedback and learner uptake in ESL composition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.05.005

Fernández-Fontecha, A., O’Halloran, K, L., Wignell, P., & Tan, S. (2020). Scaffolding CLIL in the science classroom via visual thinking: A systemic functional multimodal approach. Linguistics and Education, 55, 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100788

Ferrari, F., Picciuolo, D. & Bigi, D. (2022). Improving text comprehension in ESL learners: a multichannel approach. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16(1), 82-102, htpps://doi: 10.1080/17501229.2020.1868477

Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 371-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01081.x

Hashemi, A., Si Na, K., Noori, A., & Orfan, S. (2022). Gender differences on the acceptance and barriers of ICT use in English language learning: Students’ perspectives. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 9(1), htpps://doi: 10.1080/23311983.2022.2085381

Hrastinski, S. (2008). The potential of synchronous communication to enhance participation in online discussions: A case study of two e-learning courses. Information & Management, 45(7), 499-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.07.005

Hrastinski, S., & Keller, C. (2007). Computer-mediated communication in education: A review of recent research. Educational Media International, 44(1), 61–77.

Huffman, S, R. (2010). Using mobile technologies for synchronous CMC to develop L2 oral proficiency. In. J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.). Proceedings of the 2nd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference. (pp. 122-129)

Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494-495. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160364

Jiang, L. (2018). Digital multimodal composing and investment change in learners’ writing in English as a foreign language. Journal of second language writing, 40(2018), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.03.002

Jiang. W., & Eslami. Z. (2021). Effects of computer-mediated collaborative writing on individual EFL writing performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1893753

Johnson, S. D., & Aragon, S. R. (2003). An instructional strategy framework for online learning environments. New directions for adult and continuing education, 2003(100), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.117

Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91–109.

Khalil, Z. M. (2018). EFL students’ perceptions towards using Google Docs and Google Classroom as online collaborative tools in learning grammar. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 2(2), 33-48. https://doi: 10.14744/alrj.2018.47955

Kim, N. Y. (2019). Effects of gender difference on English learning with technology. Journal of the Korea AcademiaIndustrial Cooperation Society, 20(8), 403-416. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2019.20.8.403

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: a social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

Kress, G., (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. Routledge.

Kuyath, S. (2008). The social presence of instant messaging: Effects on student satisfaction, perceived learning, and performance in distance education [Doctoral Dissertation, University of North Carolina at Charlotte].

Lee, P. S., & Lee, C. M. (2022). Are South Korean college students benefitting from digital learning? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2047319

Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2017). Good or bad collaborative wiki writing: Exploring links between group interactions and writing products. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 38-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.01.003

Li, W. Zhang, X., & Lu, X. (2022). Beyond differences: Assessing effects of shared linguistic features on L2 writing quality of two genres. Applied Linguistics, 43(1), 168-195.

Liu, J., Sadler, R. (2003). The effects and effect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 193-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00025-0

Luik, P. (2011). Would boys and girls benefit from gender-specific educational software? British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01005.

McNamara, D., Graesser, P., McCarthy, M., & Cai, Z., (2014). Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894664

Mabrito, M. (2006). A study of synchronous versus asynchronous collaboration in an online business writing class. The American Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde2002_4

Nippard, E. C. (2005). Social presence in the web-based synchronous secondary classroom (Doctoral dissertation, Memorial University of Newfoundland). https://doi:10.19173/irrodl.v7i1.317

Murray, D. (2012). Protean communication: The language of computer-Mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3) 397-421. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587737

Odisho, E. (2007). Linguistic Tips for Latino Learners and Teachers of English. Gorgias Press.

Pacheco, M. B., Smith, B. E., Deig, A., & Amgott, N. A. (2021). Scaffolding Multimodal Composition with Emergent Bilingual Students. Journal of Literacy Research, 53(2), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X211010888

Pérez, L. (2003). Foreign language productivity in synchronous versus asynchronous computer-mediated communication. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 89-104. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24149482

Perveen, A. (2016). Synchronous and Asynchronous E-Language Learning: A Case Study of Virtual University of Pakistan. Open Praxis, 8(1), 21-39. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/171556/

Pickering, M., & Garrod, S. (2006). Alignment as the basis for successful communication. Research on Language and Computation, 4, 203-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11168-006-9004-0

Pineda Hoyos, J. E. (2018). Error correction and repair moves in synchronous learning activities. Int J Educ Technol High Educ, 15, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0105-2

Puri, G. (2012). Critical success factors in E-learning – An empirical study. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(1), 149-161.

Rourke, L., & Kanuka, H. (2009). Learning in communities of inquiry: A review of the literature. Journal of Distance Education, 23, 19–48. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/105542/.

Salas, S., Garson, K., Kanna, S., & Murray, B. (2016). Using free writing to make sense of literature. English Teaching Forum, 54(2). 12-18.

Salmon, G. (2013). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203074640

Selcuk, H., Jones, J., & Vonkova, H. (2019). The emergence and influence of group leaders in
web-based collaborative writing: Self-reported accounts of EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning,34(8). 1–21. https://doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1650781

Shuell, T., & Farber, S. (2001). Students’ perceptions of technology use in college courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2(24), 119-138. https://doi.org/10.2190/YWPN-H3DP-15LQ-QNK8

Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2019). Is there a gender gap? A meta-analysis of the gender differences in students’ ICT literacy. Educational Research Review, 27(2018), 205–217. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X18302902

Slof, B., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2021). Mine, ours and yours, whose engagement and prior knowledge affects individual achievement from online collaborative learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12466

Son, J. B. (2008). Using Web-based language learning activities. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 4(4), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijpl.4.4.34

Sotillo, S. (2000). Discourse functions and and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning and Technology, 4(1), 82-119. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/88512/.

Strobl, C. (2014). Affordances of Web 2.0 technologies for collaborative advanced writing in a foreign language. CALICO Journal, 31(1), 1–18. https:// doi:10.11139/cj.31.1.1-18

Sze Seau, L., & Azman, H. (2020). Introducing a Responsive Multimodal Oral Presentation Pedagogy: Integrating TED Videos with Web 2.0, Collaborative Learning and Teacher Feedback. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220945426

Tang, K-S., Delgado, C., & Moje, E. B. (2014). An integrative framework for the analysis of multiple and multimodal representations for meaning-making in science education. Science Education, 98(2), 305–326. htpps://doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.21099

Tolu, A. T. (2010). An exploration of synchronous communication in an online preservice ESOL course: Community of inquiry perspective [Doctoral Dissertation, University of South Florida]. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/3707

Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Junior high school students’ Internet usage and self-efficacy: A re-examination of the gender gap. Computers and Education, 54(4), 1182–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.004

Vygotsky. L. S. (1986). Thought and language. MIT Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Yasuda, R. (2022). Fluency development through freewriting and transfer to other more structured tasks. Language Teaching Research, 0(0), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221084899

Yates, S. J. (2001). Gender, language and CMC for education. Learning and Instruction, 11, 21–34.

Zhang, H., Song, W., Shen, S., & Huang, R. (2014). The effects of blog-mediated peer feedback on learners’ motivation, collaboration, and course satisfaction in a second language writing
course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(6), 670–685. https://doi:10.14742/ajet.860

Zhang, M. (2018). Collaborative writing in the EFL classroom: The effects of L1 and L2 use. System, 76, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.04.009