| تعداد نشریات | 45 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,373 |
| تعداد مقالات | 16,860 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 54,306,186 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 17,009,989 |
Critical Study of the Epistemological Foundation of Constitutionalism in Face of Modernism | ||
| مجله پژوهش های فلسفی | ||
| دوره 16، شماره 41، دی 1401، صفحه 479-489 اصل مقاله (430.04 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی- پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/jpiut.2023.54505.3428 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| غلامرضا منصوری* | ||
| دانشجوی دکترای علوم سیاسی و روابط بین الملل، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The encounter of Iranians with the modernism of the West happened for the first time during the constitutional period and through familiarization with the events and political technologies that happened in Russia, Japan, and Turkey. According to what Gadamer says, according to their political, social, economic, mental, and cultural structures, Iranians have received an understanding of modernism that is appropriate to their existential conditions, an understanding that stands as an application, and in response to the Iranians' question about the application of modernism to their lives. This article attempts to compare the epistemic foundations of both sides with a descriptive critical analytical method to show that the due to the structural differences that existed in the epistemic system of Iran and the West during the constitutional period is that it was very difficult to understand modernism in Iran and therefore, instead of bringing modernism into the country, Iranians have settled for some political technologies. Political technologies are considered a salve for their countless pains. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| modernism؛ modernity؛ constitutionalism؛ epistemology؛ political technology | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adamiyyat, F.; Ashkshirin, E. (2015). Thinking of freedom and intoduction to the constitutional movement, Vol. 1. Tehran: Gostardeh. (in persian) Azadi, A. (2008). On Pol Vandevelde’s "A Critique of Gadamer's Critical Pluralism": Some Questions. Philosophical Investigations, University of Tabriz. 205: 1-17. (in persian) Broumand, K.; Mogaddam Heidari G. (2013). Matematical view in Heidegger thought.Philosophy of Science Quarterly of Humanities Research Institute, 2(2), 19-38. (in persian) Firahi, D. (2014). Fiqh and Politics in contemporary Iran, Tehran: Nashr-e Ney. (in persian) Gezelsofla, M. (2014). Essentials of the history of Western political thought, the classical era and the modern era. Tehran: Roshd-e Amouzesh. (in persian) Haeri, A. (2020). Shism and Constitunalism in Iran, Vol. 6. Tehran: Amirkabir. (in persian) Hagdar, A. (2017). Letters of Mirza Malkam Khan Nazemoldowla, Tehran: Nashr-e Cheshme. (in persian) Hedayat, M. (1984). Irans Report: Qajar and Constitutionalism, Vol. 1. Tehran: Noghreh Publication. (in persian) Hubert, L. (1999). Michel Foucault, beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Tehran: Nashr-e Ney. (In persian) Kasravi, A. (1980). Constitutional History, Vol. 1, Tabriz: Akhtar. (in persian) Katouzian, M. (2014). The Conflict of State and Nation in Iran, Vol. 18, Tehran: Nashr-e Ney. (in persian) Katouzian, M. (2016). Freedom and Unbridledness in the Constitutional Revolution. The history of social Changes in Constitutional Revolution in Iran. (in persian) Solomon, R.; Higenz, K. (2013). The History of Philosophy in the World, Vol. 2. Tehran: Behjat. (in persian) Tabatabae, S. (2020). The decline of political thought in Iran. (in persian) Wikipedia: https://goo.by/S969X. 2020 Zaviyar, F. (2007). Reflection of west and modernism in travelogue of Mirza saleh Shirazi. Jahane Islam Political Research Quarterly, 7(3), 55-72. (in persian) | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 523 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 340 |
||
