الف) فارسی
- مهرآرام، پرهام، «تمایز حقوق از اخلاق در نظریۀ الزام حقوقیِ هانس کلسن»، تأملات فلسفی، ش 26 (1400).
ب) انگلیسی
- Books
- Kant, Immanuel, The Metaphysics of Morals, translated by Mary Gregor, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991) (Original work published 1797).
- Kelsen, Hans, Reine Rechtslehre, Erste Auflage, (Tübingen: Verlag Mohr Siebeck, 1934).
- Kelsen, Hans, Reine Rechtslehre, zweite Auflage, (Tübingen: Verlag Mohr Siebeck, 1960).
- Schmitt, Carl, Verfassungslehre, (Munich: Duncker & Humblot, 1928).
- Schmitt, Carl, Political Theology. Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1985) (Original work published 1950).
- Articles
- Alexy, Robert, “Hans Kelsen's Concept of the ‘Ought’”, Jurisprudence, Vol. 4, No. 2 (2013).
- Bertea, Stefano, “Law and Obligation: Outlines of a Kantian Argument”, in New Essays on the Normativity of Law, Bertea, G. Pavlakos, eds. (Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd, 2012).
- Beyleveld, Deryck; Brownsword, Roger, “Methodologica Syncretism in Kelsen`s pure theory of law”, in Normativity and Norms; Critical Perspective on Kelsenian Themes, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).
- Delacroix, Sylvie, “Hart’s and Kelsen’s Concepts of Normativity Contrasted”, Ratio Juris. Vol. 17, No. 4 (2004).
- Delacroix, Sylvie, “Schmitt’s Critique of Kelsenian Normativism”, Ratio Juris, Vol. 18, No. 1 (2005).
- Hart, H. L. A., “Kelsens visited”, in Normativity and Norms; Critical Perspective on Kelsenian Themes, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).
- Hart, H. L. A., “Kelsen`s Doctrine of Unity of Law”, in Normativity and Norms: Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes, (Oxford: Clarendon University Press, 1998).
- Honore, Tony, “The Basic Norm of Society”, in Normativity and Norms: Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).
- Kelsen, Hans, “The Natural-Law Doctrine before the Tribunal of Science”, The Western Political Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 4 (1949).
- Kelsen, Hans, “Value Judgement in the Science of Law”, Journal of Social Philosophy and Jurisprudence, 7, No. 312 (1942).
- Kelsen, Hans, “Causality and Imputation”, Ethics, Vol. 61, No. 1 (1950).
- Kelsen, Hans, “On the Basis of Legal Validity”, translated by Stanley L. Paulson, the American Journal of Jurisprudence, Vol 26, Issue 1 (1981) (Original work published 1960).
- Nino, Carlos Santiago, “Some Confusion Surroundings Kelsen`s Concept of Validity”, in Normativity and Norms; Critical Perspective on Kelsenian Themes, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).
- Paulson Stanley L., “An Empowerment Theory of Legal Norms”, Ratio Juris, Vol. 1, No. 1 (1988).
- Paulson, Stanley L., “The Neo-Kantian Dimension of Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 12, No. 3 (1992).
- Paulson, Stanley L., “Four Phases in Hans Kelsen's Legal Theory? Reflections on a Periodization Review”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 18, No. 1 (1998.)
- Paulson, Stanley L., “Arriving at a Defensible Periodization of Hans Kelsen's Legal Theory”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 19, No. 2 (1999).
- Paulson, Stanley L., “Hans Kelsen's Doctrine of Imputation”, Ratio Juris, Vol. 14, No. 1 (2001).
- Paulson, Stanley L, “Der Normativismus Hans Kelsens”, Juristen Zeitung, 61. , Nr. 11 (2006).
- Raz, Joseph, “The Purity of Pure Thesis”, in Normativity and Norms; Critical Perspective on Kelsenian Themes, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998) (Original work published 1981).
- Raz, Joseph, “Kelsens Theory of Basic Norm”, in Normativity and Norms; Critical Perspective on Kelsenian Themes, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).
- Raz, Joseph, “Voluntary Obligation and Normative Powers”, in Normativity and Norms; Critical Perspective on Kelsenian Themes, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).
- Wagrandl, Ulrich, “Kelsen was no Relativist: Reading Hans Kelsen in the Light of Isaiah Berlin's Value Pluralism”, in Die Reine Rechtslehre auf dem Prüfstand/ Hans Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law: Conceptions and Misconceptions, Jestaedt, Poscher & Kammerhofer (eds.), Franz Steiner Verlag (2020)
- Willaschek, Marcus, “Normativität und Autonomie. Über Verpflichtungen als Handlungsgründe”, Die Welt der Gründe. Proceedings des XXII. Deutschen Kongresses für Philosophie, hg. v. J. Nida-Rümelin und E. Özmen, (Felix Meiner: Verlag Hamburg, 2012).
|
