آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 43 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,236 |
| تعداد مقالات | 15,191 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 50,709,475 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 13,792,177 |
The Impact of Traditional vs. E-learning In-service Programs on EFL Teachers’ Educational Empowerment | ||
| Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning | ||
| دوره 14، شماره 30، بهمن 2022، صفحه 1-20 اصل مقاله (1.17 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22034/elt.2021.48442.2454 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Esmaeel Ali Salimi* 1؛ Zari Saeedi2؛ Mahmoud Saaedi Asl3 | ||
| 1Associate Professor in Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2English Language & Literature Department, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3PhD Candidate in TEFL, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Language teaching and language training are integral parts of the educational curriculum in every language centers around the world. Offices, companies, and educational centers should update themselves to keep the current progression and try to help their employees to refresh their minds based on educational development. Hence, this study explored the effectiveness of different in-service training programs on EFL teachers' empowerment concerning two factors: self-efficacy and innovation and creativity held in Khuzestan- Iran. To this end, 30 EFL teachers were selected through convenient sampling related to their experiences in each of the programs- E-learning, Class-based, and Blended ones. The participants were divided into three groups of 10 – Class-based, group A., E-learning, group B., and the experiences of the two classes (A & B), group C. An interview with 8 open-ended questions was conducted. First, all interviews were transcribed, summarized, categorized, and analyzed. Then, the derived themes were coded and analyzed through content analysis. The findings uncovered that about 80% of the participants leaned to participate in Traditional in-service class (class-based) since it had a great impact on teachers to develop and fortify their educational empowerment. Therefore, policymakers and educational centers should raise their awareness on the notion of teachers' empowerment while emphasizing on, at least, Traditional programs instead of the current E-learning and the blended ones. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Traditional in-service class؛ E-learning in-service class؛ Empowerment؛ Self-Efficacy؛ Innovation and creativity | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Alfaidi, S. D. A., & Elhassan, F. A. M. (2020). The Role of In-Service Training Programs in Teachers Development. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 191-95. Amadi, M. N. (2013). In-service training and professional development of teachers in Nigeria: Through open and distance education. Bulgarian Comparative Education Society, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Bulgarian comparative education society. Retrieved from http://www.bces-conference.org Bolin, F. S. (1989). Empowering leadership. Teachers college record. Scientific Research. An Academic Publisher, 19(1), 81-96. Ciesielkiewicz, M., & Nocito, G. (2018). Motivation in service-learning: An improvement over traditional instructional methods. Teknokultura Journal, 15(1), 55-67. Retrieved from http://dxd.oi.org/10.5209/TEKN.58258 Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DeJong, O. (2012). Empowering teachers for innovations: The case of online teacher learning communities. Creative education 3,125-129. (http://www. SciRP.org.) Denscombe, M. (2010). The good research guide (4th ed.). Open University Press. Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fathi Vajargah, K. (1997). Introduction to in-service education (planning organizing). Tehran: Saramad Kavosh pub. Freebody, P. (2003). Qualitative research in education: Introduction and practice. London: Sage. GanjiNia, H., Gilaninia, Sh., & Reza, P. M. S. (2013). Impact on in-service training on employment empowerment regional electric company in Gilan. Singaporean Journal of Business Economics and Management Studies, 2(2), 1-9. Gilster, P., & Glister, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York: Wiley Computer Pub. Hancock, D. R., & Algozzine, B. (2017). Doing case study research (3rd ed.). New York, Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. London: Longman. Hervie, D. M., & Winful, E. Ch. (2018). Enhancing teachers’ performance through training and development in Ghana education service (A case study of Ebenezer senior high school). Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(1), 1-8. Retrieved from http://www.science publishinggroup.com/j/jhrm Khodayi M. R., & Moghtader, K. J. (2016). The effect of in-service training on the empowerment of staff at the University of Tabriz. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies. 2001-2007. Retrieved from http://www.ijhcs.com/index. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research. Methodology and design. London. Manning, P. K., & Cullum-Swam, B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. London: The Falmer Press. Mirrezaei, H., Ayoubi, A., & Mosallanejad, A. (2018). The effect of in-service training on employees’ productivity in education and training organizations. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 24(1), 134-142. Murray, E. D., & Christison, M. A. (2012). Understanding innovation in English language education: Contexts and issues. In T. Christopher (ed.), Managing Change in English Language Teaching: Lessons from Experience (pp. 61-74). London: British Council NY: Teachers College Press. Osamwonyi, E. F. (2016). In-Service Education of Teachers: Overview, Problems and the Way Forward. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(26), 83-87. Öztürk, M. (2019). An Evaluation of an Innovative In-Service Teacher Training Model in Turkey. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(1), 23-36. Patton, M. Q. (1988). Qualitative evaluation methods (9th ed.). London: SAGE publications. Inc. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluative methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pettis, j. (2002). Developing our professional competence: some reflection. In M. Dehgan (Ed.), Foreign language teaching journal, 1(25), 13-18. Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. New York: Cambridge University Press. Shirvan, K., Beygzadeh, A. F., & Sayadi, S. (2016). The effect of in-service training on employees’ empowerment of Shahid Bahonar University in Kerman. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 6(1), 271-276. Tzivinikou, S. (2015). The impact of an in-service training program on the self-efficacy of special and general education teachers. Journal of Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 64, 95-97. Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Woolfolk, A.E., Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2003). Educational psychology (2nd ed.). Canada: Pearson Education Canada. Zanjanizadeh, H. (2007). The effect of training on productivity. Background Journal, 2(2), p.101. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 617 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 558 |
||